Skip to main content

SPECIALIZED REVIEW · IN DEVELOPMENT

See risk from four directions.

Voqio Security Review is being designed as an evidence-led workflow for code, configuration, and authorized logs. Four independent AI reviewers examine different risk surfaces; a human decides what is valid and what happens next.

Independent scopes before synthesis.

01 / IDENTITY

AccessGuard

Authentication, authorization, sessions, account recovery, privilege boundaries, and access-control failures.

02 / DATA

DataShield

Sensitive-data handling, secrets, encryption decisions, exposure paths, retention, and privacy risks.

03 / ATTACK

AttackBarrier

Input handling, injection, request abuse, dependency exposure, unsafe defaults, and defensive controls.

04 / RESPONSE

Watchtower

Logging, detection, alerting, incident readiness, recovery controls, and missing operational evidence.

Prepare and test the review experience.

This deterministic prototype makes no provider request, stores nothing, uses no daily session or credit, and discards its state when the page is refreshed.

Prototype ready. No content has been analyzed.

0 / 40,000 total characters · 0 / 6 sections supplied

Human authorization and scope
Recommended prototype settings
Review modeBalanced static review
Evidence policyExact supplied source references only
SecretsBlock before review — no bypass
RetentionOff — local page state only
ExecutionNever run code or contact systems
Decision authorityHuman approval required

A security opinion is useful only when it can be checked.

Evidence

Exact source reference, affected surface, confidence, assumptions, and what evidence is missing.

Risk

Severity, plausible impact, exploit preconditions, and clear separation between observed and inferred risk.

Action

Specific remediation, priority, verification steps, and an explicit human decision before change.

Review assistance—not a guarantee.

Voqio Security will not present an AI response as proof that a system is secure.

  • Not a penetration test, compliance audit, certification, or warranty.
  • Never upload passwords, API keys, private keys, tokens, or unnecessary personal data.
  • Code is reviewed as text; it is not executed or automatically modified.
  • Retention will be off by default and provider submission will require an explicit review.
  • Findings require human verification and appropriate professional testing.

Safety gates come before the product button.

Secret boundary

Likely credentials must be detected before provider submission. The review stops until the member removes or replaces them.

Evidence contract

A finding without a source reference, observed behavior, confidence, remediation, and verification steps cannot pass.

Human authorization

Members must confirm they are authorized to review the supplied system and approve every retained result or downstream action.